About


Built on the principle that intelligence drives operations.

What We Do


An intelligence-first accountability firm.

Dymaxion Partners is a systems intelligence and accountability consulting firm. We specialize in identifying legal recovery opportunities — class action settlements, regulatory claims, and liability actions — that municipalities, water districts, and public entities are positioned to pursue but often don't know exist.

Our approach is research-first. We conduct deep due diligence on emerging and active class action opportunities, identify which communities have standing, and then serve as independent advisors to those communities — building the expert ecosystem around them and guiding them through the process.

How We Work


A clear path from opportunity to recovery.

1. Research & Discovery. We continuously monitor active and emerging class actions, regulatory claims, and liability matters where public entities have standing. When we identify an opportunity that fits a community, we conduct conflict-checked due diligence to confirm fit before any outreach.
2. Confidential Briefing. We approach the municipality with a no-cost briefing: what's available, what's required, what the timeline looks like, and what realistic recovery could mean for the community. The municipality decides whether to proceed.
3. Independent Advisory Engagement. If the municipality moves forward, we serve as their independent advisor under a contingency-based agreement — no upfront cost, no out-of-pocket spend. Our compensation comes from recovery, which means our incentives are aligned with the community's from day one.
4. Expert Ecosystem Assembly. We build and direct the team around the municipality: legal counsel, environmental consultants, forensic specialists, and expert witnesses. We coordinate between them so the community has one trusted point of contact and one coherent strategy.
5. Claim Development & Recovery. We manage the technical workstreams that translate environmental harm into recoverable claim value — source attribution, contamination data, modeling, and litigation-grade reporting where required. We carry the engagement through enrollment, valuation, and settlement.

BEYOND RECOVERY


The check is the beginning, not the end.

Recovery dollars are necessary but insufficient. PFAS contamination doesn't clean itself up because a settlement closes. A water system that's been compromised needs the actual replacement built — not just funded. Most firms walk away at recovery. We stay.

6. Implementation & Project Management. Once recovery is secured, we help the municipality translate dollars into action: building RFPs, vetting contractors, assembling the operational team, and project-managing the work through completion. For PFAS, that means the cleanup and water system replacement itself — carried through to a functioning result.
7. Ongoing Intelligence Partnership. Communities we've worked with stay inside our intelligence network. We identify additional funding sources — federal grants, state programs, complementary class actions, and emerging recovery matters — and assist with the proposals and applications. We remain a standing partner: eyes and ears for opportunities, funding streams, and risks the municipality wouldn't otherwise see.

Our Philosophy


Tikkun Olam — Repair the World.

We believe corporations that cause systemic harm must be held accountable — not as an abstract principle, but as a practical, recoverable dollar amount and as a functioning remediation built from the ground up.

The capabilities that define private intelligence networks: deep research, source development, coordinated expert ecosystems, long-horizon strategy — have historically served corporate clients defending against liability. We exist to bring that same rigor to the side of the ledger that's been chronically out-resourced: the municipalities, water districts, and public entities that bear the cost of corporate harm. Same network depth. Different cause.

Inspired by the systems thinking of Buckminster Fuller, Donella Meadows, and Russell Ackoff, we approach accountability the way an engineer approaches a broken system: find the leverage points, build the structure, apply the force.